Permissives vs. Interlocks: They Are Not the Same Thing


0

In industrial automation, the words permissive and interlock are often used as if they mean the same thing.

They do not.

Both are conditions that influence whether equipment is allowed to operate, …

Read More

Faults vs. Alarms vs. Notifications: Are We Calling Everything an Alarm?


0

In industrial automation, the word alarm is often used for almost everything that goes wrong.

A motor fails to start.

A tank reaches a high level.

A VFD trips.

A communication module disconnects.

An operator …

Read More

One Device, One Control Point: Why Multiple Writes Make PLC Troubleshooting Dangerous


0

A PLC program can work perfectly and still be difficult to troubleshoot.

That distinction matters.

When we first learn ladder logic, the goal is usually simple:

Make the motor run.

Later, the goal becomes …

Read More

Trigger, Hold-In, Interrupt: Is This Really the Backbone of PLC Programming?


0

One of the most useful PLC programming patterns a technician can learn is also one of the simplest:

Trigger → Hold-In → Interrupt

The idea is straightforward.

Something starts the action.

Something keeps it …

Read More

Seal-In Logic vs. Latch/Unlatch: Which Is Better for Industrial PLC Control?


0

In industrial PLC programming, there are often several ways to make the same machine work.

Two of the most common methods for maintaining a control condition are Seal-In logic and Latch/Unlatch …

Read More

1. Why Buffer PLC I/O? Understanding I/O Mapping in Studio 5000 (1 of 10)


0

When working with Allen-Bradley ControlLogix or CompactLogix systems, one of the first architectural decisions a programmer eventually faces is how to handle physical I/O inside the PLC program.

At the beginning, …

Read More

2. Direct I/O vs Alias Tags vs Mapped Tags in Studio 5000 (2 of 10)


0

In the first article of this series, we introduced the idea of separating physical PLC I/O from application logic.

Now we can address one of the most common questions in Allen-Bradley …

Read More

3. MOV, XIC/OTE, and Individual I/O Mapping in Studio 5000 (3 of 10)


0

In the previous article, we compared three common ways of representing PLC I/O:

Direct physical I/O

Alias Tags

Mapped controller tags

Now it is time to build the mapping layer itself.

For digital signals, one …

Read More

4. COP vs CPS in Studio 5000 — Block I/O Buffering and Data Consistency (4 of 10)


0

In the previous article, we built an I/O mapping layer using individual instructions.

For digital signals, we used logic such as:

XIC Physic
al_Input
OTE Internal_Tag

For numeric values, we introduced:

MOV Source Destination

This approach is …

Read More

5. UDT-Based I/O Mapping in Studio 5000 — Building a Scalable PLC Architecture (5 of 10)


0

In the previous articles, we built an I/O architecture using:

Direct physical I/O

Alias Tags

Individual mapped tags

XIC/XIO and OTE

MOV

COP

CPS

These methods allow us to separate physical hardware from application logic.

But as the machine …

Read More